b'8.Court and Regulatory Rules. Some courts or regulators may require the use of GAI tools to be disclosed, documented, or certified. These rules may require a party to: (i) identify which GAI tool was used in drafting a court filing; (ii) explain how the GAI tool was used in preparing court filings orregulatedsubmissions;(iii)verifytheaccuracyofAI-generatedcontentusingnon-GAI authoritativesources;and/or(iv)confirmthatnoconfidentialorproprietaryinformationwas disclosed to unauthorized parties. Accordingly, prior to using Approved GAI Tools to prepare any materials that will be used in a judicial or regulatory proceeding, the supervising attorney will confirm what GAI rules apply to that proceeding. 9.Data Minimization. Each ACME Workforce member must limit the retention of data in Approved GAI Tools to only what is reasonably necessary to support the project or matter for which the Approved GAI Tools are used. Approved GAI Tools should not be used as long-term storage or recordkeepingsystems.Forexample,Workforcemembersshoulddeleteconversations, documents, prompts, instructions, memory functions, and other related data when the associated client matter is closed, or if no longer reasonably needed to manage that specific project or matter. 10.Education and Training. The ACME Managing Partner will coordinate education and training for all members of the ACME Workforce on the responsible use of artificial intelligence, including the requirements of this Policy. This training should include understanding ethical implications, dataprivacyandsecurityrisks,andtheeffectivepracticaluseofapprovedGAItoolsand extensions. 11.Intellectual Property. The output of a Generative Artificial Intelligence tool may not be subject to intellectual property protection. Accordingly, Generative Artificial Intelligence output may not be incorporatedintomaterialsintendedtohaveintellectualpropertyprotectionwithoutspecific review and approval on a case-by-case basis. Accordingly, absent such review and approval, all work product intended to receive intellectual property protection must be original work produced by ACME Workforce members acting within the scope of their employment or engagement and not work product that is produced by a GAI tool. 12.Enhanced Periodic Review. As previously noted, the field of Artificial Intelligence is evolving rapidly. Accordingly, this Policy must be reviewed on a more frequent basis than provided in other ACME policies. The ACME Managing Partner is therefore directed to establish an Artificial Intelligence Review Committee and a policy review schedule that is appropriate to the speed at which this technology is evolving and the rate at which AI-related tools are adopted within ACME (and our clients and vendors).13.Version Control. Any amendments or additions to this Policy shall be reflected in a new version and summarized in the attached Revision Management Log. Revision Management LogRevision IDDateBrief Description AI-100.1************Initial Policy AdoptionPage | 45'