b'that would otherwise be required by this Rule. This latter use is particularly relevant to discussions about client notice, opt-out rights, and use of informed consent as an additional safeguard. WealignwiththeAmericanBarAssociationsviewthat,whereclientconsentisrequired,itmustbe informed. 41This Guide focuses on implementation; lawyers retain professional judgment, consistent with Rules 1.4 and 1.6, to determine the nature and extent of client communication appropriate to the particular engagement and the type of data processing contemplated. To support that judgment, this Guide offers a Sample Notice of Artificial Intelligence Practices (Appendix 3) that firms may adapt for use in engagement materials or on firm websites. Firms may also designate a knowledgeable point of contact for AI-related client inquiries;dependingonthefirmsstructure,thismaybealawyeroranon-lawyer(e.g.,avendoror outsourced IT professional), subject to confidentiality and supervision obligations. Where more extensive AI processingorSensitivePersonalInformationisinvolved,enhancedmatter-specificexplanationsand informed written consent may be prudent.Key Takeaways Summarizing everything weve discussed in this Section:The baseline for our hypotheticals and sample forms is that of a GAI tool aligned with the businesscategory in Table 2. When using such a tool to process information that is classified no higher thanConfidential Information (as defined in Step 1 of the Core Framework), lawyers are encouraged to provide clients with notice and a right to opt out. A sample notice form provided at Appendix 3.When processing Sensitive Personal Information, lawyers are encouraged to incorporate additionalsafeguards, such as those aligned with the enterprise category in Table 2 and/or seeking informed client consent. A sample informed consent form is provided in Appendix 5.LawyersshouldexercisecautionwhenusingGAItoolsthatalignwiththepublicorconsumercategory in Table 2, even for De-Identified Information. Where a lawyer reasonably determines thatsuch a tool is appropriate for limited use, it is generally prudent to also obtain informed client consent.As GAI becomes more integrated into our computers and applications, Lawyers and clients shouldunderstand that it may become infeasible to disable some GAI features. In such cases, lawyers areencouraged to focus on enterprise-aligned safeguards, where possible, to offset the infeasibility ofproviding clients with opt-out or consent rights.We recognize that these concepts are evolving rapidly, and we do not expect lawyers to become artificial intelligence experts or dedicate extensive research to mastering every nuance in the universe of artificial 41ABA Comm. on Ethics & Profl Responsibility, Formal Op. 512 (July 29, 2024) (addressing Generative Artificial Intelligence tools) (When consent is required, it must be informed. For the consent to be informed, the client must have the lawyers best judgment about why the GAI tool is being used, the extent of and specific information about the risk, including particulars about the kinds of client information that will be disclosed, the ways in which others might use the information against the clients interests, and a clear explanation of the GAI tools benefits to the representation.).Page | 21'